|
Re: the retaliatory attack by your chosen yobo 'survey' team, the question of
our human rights and your easy-going manufacture of 'porkies'!
Dear Ombudsman,
Re your letter 30 Nov 2006, with all the goodwill in the world, one cannot
forget that you stand at the head of a corrupt Ombudsman structure, namely the
public sector complaints procedure. That you are falling back on the well-honed
public sector routine of trying to bury your fraudulent retaliation survey
'front' with banal apologies. We are by now immune to your worthless public
sector complaint procedure apologies.
We have already described in detail your dishonest survey, how when my wife
first picked up the phone and was asked by your selected survey team "if she
would answer their question re your survey" My wife replied to your survey team
"No thank you". We wrote to you in some annoyance CLAIMING THAT IN A CIVILISED
SOCIETY THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN ENOUGH. Indicating to you, that an honest survey
team would have left us alone and moved on. One can see from the evidence that
this was not an honest survey, that it had undertones relating to Ombudsman
retaliation.
One can also see that this was not an honest survey team. They were intent on
badgering us into taking part - something we had earlier indicated to you that
we had no intention of doing. Although you knew we wanted no part in your survey
- you made no effort to stop this dishonest subterfuge hounding.
You employed a strident intrusive 'survey team' that would not go away when
asked but persisted against our wishes, using ombudsman style devious
aggression. They acted like seasoned abusers against victims of corruption!
You were responsible for employing these yobs who treated us with brash
contempt. They were consistent in their aggression and despite being told that
we would not answer their questions with a polite 'No thank you' from my wife,
they stuck firmly to their guns and remained loyal to the disreputable task that
you had set them.
THIS WAS NOT AN HONEST SURVEY
It was a 'front' that enabled you to retaliate against us because we had
disclosed your corrupt acts. You were determined to make life uncomfortable
for us because we had disclosed your manufacture of 'porkies' etc.!
You purposely ignored our plea for privacy in this matter, thus allowing
your aggressive yobs to continually pester us. This was pure retaliation on your
part, we were being punished for disclosing your corrupt acts and further
disclosures concerning public sector corruption, in which you played a leading
cover-up role. You were trying to frighten us off by employing jackboots
pretending to provide a Westminster survey.
Our privacy was invaded by these Westminster bully tactics, as used by your
appointed abusive intruders into our privacy, especially as we had made it clear
to you that we did not want to take part. It is worth pointing out once more,
that in any civilised society our refusal to take part would have been enough
for an honest survey team, to desist, pack up their bags and go on to the next
client.
We repeat this was not the actions of an honest survey team, your selected team
were determined to hound us despite our protest. You, a parliamentary ombudsman,
having prior notice that we did not want to take part, allowed your chosen
belligerents to carry on and hound us!
The obvious question arising from this Westminster gaff is who gave this
dishonest survey team instruction to be so intrusively aggressive? We know from
experience that you are corrupt and belligerent with it! It is quite conceivable
that your survey yobs took their belligerence from your strident attitude
against us.
Because this is another of your Westminster inspired gaffs, it shows even
further contempt for our human rights, we ask; what's next? a dreaded knock on
the door?
While I myself am prepared to face your corruption head on, I have to say my
wife now feels afraid that "something will happen", that after almost 4 years of
public sector chicanery, she has become frightened, simply because we have
complained about public sector corruption, though we now face retaliation!
Its like being under fire all over again, at least we knew that Adolph was the
enemy, now we seem to have an established fifth column that attacks honest
protesters? (It would appear there is nobody in parliament to stop you, such is
your anointed misuse of power!)
Your appointed survey team were nasty in their aggressive persistence and in
their lack of honest survey technique, that one is led to believe that you, the
planner, may well have hand-picked these experienced yobs yourself. We say this
because they came from the same belligerent 'couldn't care less' mould so
typical of your own corrupt actions against us!
We felt as though we were being browbeaten by ombudsman bully boys, who
would not take no for an answer. They had not set out to do an honest civilised
survey; they had a hidden agenda to browbeat us.
What about the quite enjoyment of our own home
(Article one Protocol one, Human Rights Act)?
We believe the dishonest 'survey' yobs knew what was expected of them - they
were there to do a browbeating 'job on us' for as long as it took?. All this
browbeating because we were critics of public sector corruption - the same
corruption you failed to hide with your 'porkies'.
With your usual deceitful ombudsman cover-up stance you now want to imply that
you have 'dealt' with this ombudsman inspired survey hounding. That you have
'told them off' and you now claim 'that they will not do it again??'
YOU COULD NOT MAKE IT UP!
This indicates just how unruly your 'survey mob' was. It must not be
forgotten however, that it was you who set them upon us! Your contemptuous
retaliation against us as victims of your corruption is a serious violation of
parliamentary democracy and a corruption of parliamentary values. We have
mentioned Al Capone before now when criticising your fraudulent acts, we have
become to realise that you and he have a lot in common as when dealing with the
underdog - his philosophy was "just tread on em"!
Now you deceitfully want to imply this 'survey' abuse of our human rights can be
dismissively brushed away with the public sectors well-worn apology routine!
That you want to indicate you have 'sorted' your sordid retaliative shameful act
against us by telling your 'hired hands' NOT TO DO IT AGAIN? What a
ridiculous Ombudsman cop-out. You set them upon us, and then claim by telling
them 'not to do it again', it is a sufficient apology for yet another corrupt
act!
The mind boggles at your crass self-protective capabilities.
Al Capone would have said in his defence at such a gaff "It was all their
fault guv, I only hired them!"
Human rights are not to be abused with impunity!
Another important point concerning your disrespect for our human rights, is that
after we had fingered and laid bare your fabrications (porkies), and having
pin-pointed your glaring lies - you then closed our case down - you don't want
your corrupt acts discussed any more?
We realise with much disgust that you do have the easy facility to misuse your
power and bury your corrupt acts! The key to such abomination of the democratic
principle seems to be that no one in Westminster will lift a finger against you.
Because of this parliamentary laxity you have become a freewheeling jack booting
tyrant
You're sticking your head in the sand in regard to not wanting to discuss your
corruption against us any further, will not make your corrupt acts go away. When
you eventually pull your head out from the sand - you will find your corrupt
acts will still be here - no amount of whitewashing apologies will make them
disappear - even your witch's wand is guaranteed to fail! Even more Ombudsman
Westminster 'porkies' will not suffice.
You are following the Ombudsman tradition, where over the years by deceitful
orchestration, they gave themselves much tyrannical power - where instead of
protecting the public as was intended - they have become by devious design,
persecutors of citizens rights? They have in fact been largely responsible
for perfecting the "Old Pals Act" that has become an entrenched self-protective
industry much used by public sector miscreants nation-wide!
Ombudsman in general with great relish, take an active part in condoning and
manipulating fraudulent acts against members of the public who have legitimate
claims against public sector employees. You/they have destroyed up-front
accountability. As we have pointed out, you have, without a care in the world,
and with great effrontery, retaliated against our claims of public sector
corruption - we now feel the knock on the door is well within your devious
orchestrating powers!
You seem obsessed in protecting civil servant miscreants, and in doing so
forget your salaried parliamentary obligations i.e., protecting members of the
public against corrupt civil servants. Such deception makes you an over-blown
expensive blight on the MOTHER OF PARLIAMENT!
It's quite amazing how a civil servant miscreant like you can operate behind
lawyers and stupid legislation that makes you untouchable, hence the
freewheeling corrupt acts, and all this paid for by taxpayer's money. While a
war pensioner has been denied justice under this fraudulent system. Even a
minuscule amount of my war pension will have found its way into this perverse
system that allows you to persecute us and many others with 'porkies' and
blatant disregard for democracy etc.
We have to ask however did you get this parliamentary position, we are
intrigued? Was it political influence? Family connections? We are mystified that
you have attained such an influential position that should be anointed with
honesty - and there you are sullying the position - more like the artful dodger!
You yourself, in the most strident manner have used 'porkies' against us, trying
to destabilise our case. You are corrupt in pretending you do not see any
evidence of fraud or corruption in our case. It is common knowledge that
Ombudsman careers in general, are largely based on denial of facts with a severe
lack of transparency, aided by a spurious apology routine, you are no exception
to this undemocratic abomination.
We have been denied justice by your systematic pretended blindness. We will put
our case into the public domain, thus giving our case a whiff of transparency it
so richly deserves.
We shudder to think how many complaining victims of the public sector
complaints procedures you have steam-rolled into complying with your deceitful
manipulative acts? You are a disgrace to Parliament, the Queen and the British
people! Resign!
Although by now you will be aware that because of the injustice of your closing
down our case, our only recourse to justice is to broadcast it on the Internet
and that although you are aware of it, we send these sites on to you in good
faith!
www.psow.co.uk/archives/awtannerpage.html or 'google' under Parliamentary Ombudsman corruption
Yours sincerely
AW & I Tanner
[Back to the top]
|