|
The demeaning of the Mother of Parliament by the 'porky' laden
Parliamentary Ombudsman and her 'couldn't care less' acolytes,
leading to a Whitehall farce, where civil service bumbledom and
worse reigns supreme.
As far as the public sector complaint procedures are concerned The
Mother of Parliament is not upright anymore. She is looking
decidedly bedraggled by the knock-on effect of the corrupt antics
of the 'porky' laden female, the Parliamentary Ombudsman, Ms Ann
Abraham. Who has abandoned her position as a Parliamentary
adjudicator and taken upon herself the Fanny Craddock style role
of producing, without a care in the world, mindless Westminster
'porkies'!
With much contempt for the electorate and parliamentarians, she
has besmirched the world renowned Mother of Parliament! The
Ombudsman also with much contempt, offers victims of public sector
fraud and corruption sums of money, claiming the derisory sum is
the 'norm' and in lieu of justice - that such a pittance is
sufficient enough to cover up the enormity of much civil service
corruption.
Such disgraceful 'old pal acts' are designed to protect corrupt
miscreant civil servants for ever and ever, whilst denying their
victims even a semblance of up-to-date justice. This is to demean
the Mother of Parliament and the whole structure of parliamentary
democracy.
Just how much abuse to the Mother of Parliament can elected
members of parliament close their eyes to?
Because we believe in democracy we find, because of the
Ombudsman's bias, we are forced, like others, to make public the
enormity of public sector fraud and corruption, so that the
British public learn of the civil service cover-up industry as
aided and abetted by the corrupt Ombudsman system. If we do not
get compensation so be it, we will have been compensated enough in
disclosing this Ombudsman protected cover-up industry that has
overwhelmed untold thousands of victims, downtrodden by years of
Ombudsman orientated corrupt complaint procedures!
People are appalled how the Ombudsman has purposely contrived to
see 'no evidence of fraud and corruption' in our case. She fails
to see glaring examples of corruption. She is unfit for office!
She cannot claim to be impartial, her outrageous 'pork-pies' are
cooked up to deceive.
No wonder people are turning their backs on Politics, when they
learn amongst other things, of the Ombudsman's free-range
fraudulent acts within Westminster. As when amongst other things
she launched a jackbooting political assassin style survey team to
hit us in the evenings with browbeating telephone calls. Where
she, knowing that we did not want to participate in her fraudulent
sham survey, allowed her brow beaters to pursue us with aggressive
calls three evenings running!
The Ombudsman's dissembling of truth as in our case, has become
involved and convoluted as we repeated our complaints to various
government departments. The Ombudsman stopped answering our
letters after we had fingered her 'porkies' and in doing so, she
closed down our democratic and civic rights.
The Information Commissioners Office has also followed her
actions, and has undemocratically refused to answer our request
for information without any explanation? Is this collusion? More
human rights abuse? As victims of public sector corruption, we
have been banned by the ICO from the Freedom of Information
process. It all adds up to the public sectors entrenched cover-up
industry.
Because we had effectively been frozen out of the democratic
process, we did not know where to turn. So, being disenfranchised
we wrote to the Lord Chancellors office, thinking it was the
appropriate office to answer our question re the ICO's
undemocratic action in closing down our case.
This request to the Lord Chancellors office become somewhat
frenetic as it was shunted, as though it was a hot potato, from
one department to another, without anybody wanting to touch it. We
were perplexed to learn that;
(1) Instead of answering our letter re the ICO the Lord
Chancellors office washed their hands of it and sent it on to;
(2) The Revenue & Customs, who also not wanting to sully their
hands with 'porkies' and corrupt acts, sent it on to the corrupt
Valuation Office Agency?
(3) It seems incredible that our letter to the Lord Chancellors
office should eventually arrive at the fraudulent VOA. How can
anyone allow the dysfunctional VOA to answer our question to the
Lord Chancellors office in regard to the ICO's undemocratic
actions towards us?
It has to be remembered it was the VOA who held a dodgy 'internal
investigation' that produced a corrupt verdict against us! Also it
is not within the VOA's remit to answer our query re the ICO!
HISTORICALLY, AS FAR AS WE ARE CONCERNED, THE VOA CANNOT BE
TRUSTED TO ACT ON OUR BEHALF ! It is quite absurd that this
corrupt agency was chosen to answer our letter to the Lord
Chancellors office?
(4) However, with true public sector fraudulence the VOA did take
on the question I posed to the Lord Chancellor re ICO, and
answered for the said Lord Chancellor by claiming there was
nothing further the VOA could do! The VOA summarily and corruptly
answered the question I posed to the Lord Chancellor, by simply
dismissing the question, bulldozing it into touch?
(5) It could be said that some public sector evil influence is
manipulating the 'hanging out to dry' routine with a vengeance,
but to redirect our Lord Chancellors letter concerning the ICO to
the fraudulent dysfunctional VOA for action is quite
reprehensible.
One can only assume, that this undemocratic sweeping under the
carpet action by the VOA, has pleased the Lord Chancellors office
and the Revenue & Customs men?
It remains to be seen who is going to answer our important
question; 'Why has the ICO closed down our case without giving us
an explanation, thereby leaving us disenfranchised'? We have
written to the VOA, asking how the devil they could take
responsibility for answering our letter to the Lord Chancellor
regarding our problems with the ICO? And then have the audacity to
close down the issue between the Lord Chancellors office, the ICO
and ourselves? We know them to be fraudulent! This is pure
Whitehall farce.
YOU COULD NOT MAKE IT UP!
(6) How can the buck be passed on to this severely discredited VOA
agency? One can see the knock-on effect of the Parliamentary
Ombudsman's 'porkies'. It is causing much chaos and connivance in
the public sector.
(7) The mind boggles at the chaotic mess the dodgy Ombudsman's
'porkies' have created within the 'Mother of Parliament'. It's the
open-sewer blatancy of the prevalent cover-up culture, the passing
the buck, the collusion between government departments that is
besmirching Westminster and corrupting the ideal that we all once
held, namely, that the Mother of Parliament was something special
to be proud of. But not any more!
It would appear from much evidence, that all Ombudsman offices
operate from dung heaps of deceit and a pyramids of 'porkies'. All
this has created over the years an eye-watering stench against
democracy and transparency, we have to point out again, that all
this is within smelling distance of Parliament. Obviously not
enough parliamentarians wish to pick up on this plague-like
Ombudsman miasma.
Before we can remove the stench - we have to remove the Ombudsman!
AW & I Tanner
[Back to the top]
|